« Article on SOA and business rules | Main | Building a nimble organization with EDM »

Business Intelligence 2.0 and Enterprise Decision Management

I have been reading a few things on "BI 2.0" and it made me wonder about the phrase and about the differences, or similarities, between BI 2.0 and EDM. I know Charles Nicholls of SeeWhy and read his nice little eBook. You may have seen SeeWhy in this Computerworld article or this ebizQ one (complete with a podcast).

I poked around and read a little about Celequest (with whom I have met) and Neil Raden's nice article "Bye-bye BI" in Intelligent Enterprise. I also read Charles' blog (though he has been quiet of late) and Diaz's (similarly sparse). Finally there was the classic research approach now taught in elementary school - I googled it.

Anyway, the upshot of all this is that there seems no broad agreement on what BI 2.0 is, though there are some characteristics that many people think it has. While these overlap with Enterprise Decision Management somewhat they are not the same and I think it is worth exploring it the similarities and differences a little.

First, let's see what the widely discussed BI 2.0 characteristics might look like:

  • BI 2.0 integrates events
    The inclusion of events as something to be tracked, analyzed and used is widely agreed. We see discussions of "event-driven BI" to analyze streams of data, keep running totals without an intermediate storage mechanism.
  • BI 2.0 delivers insight
    The need to deliver insight not information or reports comes up a fair bit - the idea that events or data are not interesting but insights derived from them, especially insights derived rapidly, are.
  • BI 2.0 delivers action without intervention
    Several mentions of a more automated handling of the consequences of insight - the idea of taking corrective action without human intervention.
  • BI 2.0 is Real-time
    Probably the single most agreed feature - all of this must be in real-time or close to it. There is a lot of talk about reducing all aspects of latency close to zero
  • BI 2.0 is based on SOA and Web 2.0
    Like most things new BI 2.0 is expected to be service-based and Web 2.0 technologies are expected to impact the UI for BI 2.0

Much of this seems similar to discussions of operational BI. For instance, Neil Raden describes operational BI in his article:

"Operational BI or, more accurately, operational analytics, must be as lightweight and configurable as services. Grabbing a piece of historical data from a data warehouse, aligning it with current information from an operational process, perhaps dynamically generating a forecast based on trend analysis or even a stochastic process like Monte Carlo Simulation to produce a range of outcomes--all these activities must happen transparently and in near-real time. "

What we see is a focus on what you might call intelligent processes - ones where actual events drive responses in real time that rely on analysis of both data and events, particularly predictive analysis. Now both Celequest and SeeWhy seem to be taking what I would call an Enterprise Decision Management or EDM approach. The Celequest website explicitly talks about their server being implemented using a mix of analytics and business rules while SeeWhy must have some capability to execute rules to decide which alerts to send/actions to take when its real-time analytics come up with predictions that need responses. That said, they are also both focused on event-driven decisioning rather than "in-process" decisioning.

So how does BI 2.0 compare with EDM? Well EDM is likewise focused on delivering and acting on insight, often in real-time. EDM is service-oriented with its focus on decision services. Where they differ is really in three areas:

  • EDM is a balance between analytic insight and explicit knowledge/regulations.
    BI 2.0 seems to be more focused on the analytic insight piece with rules (knowledge, regulations) relegated to a secondary position
  • EDM separates out the business decision-making completely from the context
    This allows decisions to be reused in processes, legacy systems, in response to an event etc. BI 2.0 seems very focused on event-based triggers to the exclusion of other kinds of decisioning.
  • EDM is focused on decisions as a corporate asset
    BI 2.0 is not.

I have blogged before about CEP(Complex Event Processing) and BAM (Business Activity Monitoring), both of which seem BI 2.0-related. In each case I believe that the decisions need to be externalized and managed so they can be used and maintained and improved independently. Let's end with another quote from Neil:

"Facing a global, externalized business environment, leading organizations must push beyond conventional BI and data-warehousing approaches and seek adaptable, agile solutions"

I think the products focusing on BI 2.0 are some of what you need for these "adaptable, agile solutions" but I think EDM is needed too.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

First time on the EDM blog?
Subscribe to the EDM blog feed or check out some other recent posts:


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Business Intelligence 2.0 and Enterprise Decision Management:

» Another opinion on intelligent business processes from James Taylor's Decision Management
I just saw Charles Nicholls' article "Building Intelligent Business Processes into SOA". This was very timely as not only have I recently blogged about SeeWhy and BI 2.0 before I also saw Charles last week (we used to work together).... [Read More]

» Great article on BI 2.0 from James Taylor's Decision Management
Neil Raden has written a great piece over on Intelligent Enterprise about BI 2.0. I blogged about this area before a few times - when I wrote about intelligent business processes, about BI 2.0 but I particularly liked Neil's comment:... [Read More]

» BI 2.0? from BI Questions Blog
First, I agree with most of the coverage of business intelligence 2.0 so far: yes, the term is a little tacky -- but it's irresistible (and a great way of finding people blogging about Business Intelligence) An irresistible term A... [Read More]

» BI 2.0? from BI Questions Blog
First, I agree with most of the coverage of business intelligence 2.0 so far: yes, the term is a little tacky -- but it's irresistible (and a great way of finding people blogging about Business Intelligence) An irresistible term A... [Read More]



Charles recently puiblished an article in DM Review also - check out

Christopher Ahlberg

I think this is real nice James - but we're sure up for an interesting debate in terms of whether next generation of BI is about whether the key next push is about automation at large - or if it is about letting people (end users) create and be creative. I'm making some points about that

You put Blink in the "EDM library" - isn't that book really about how we can enable people to achieve clever insights more than automation?

In the end game we of course have to do both automation and enable creativity - and they can work together - but I wonder what's the real next breakthrough is here.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Search Site



  • enter your email

Upcoming Events

  • FICO Tools & Analytics User Forum 2012
    BERLIN: September 11-12, 2012 LONDON: September 18-19, 2012 Gain new insights for improving business performance through advanced analytics and decision management tools.